Cohort study identifies ecological and in-hospital factors influencing CRE colonization in ICU patients, suggesting enhanced infection control measures.
Background: Identifying risk factors for gastrointestinal CRE colonization and acquisition is essential for guiding infection prevention and control strategies; however, most studies focus exclusively on colonization at hospital admission.Aim: We aimed to distinguish determinants of CRE colonization present at intensive care unit (ICU) admission from those driving acquisition during ICU stay using serial surveillance screening.Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in two ICUs in Brazil.Screening relied on rectal swab cultures from April 2022-May 2024, supplemented with immunochromatographic testing in one ICU and polymerase chain reaction in the other during October 2023-May 2024.Colonization at admission and incident acquisition during stay were outcomes of interest.Pre-ICU predictors were evaluated using logistic regression with LASSO selection, while post-ICU factors were assessed through generalized estimating equations.Findings: Among 751 patients, 39 (5%) were colonized with CRE at ICU admission.Previous acute care hospitalization (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.70; p = 0.006) and transfer from another hospital (OR 2.62; p = 0.046) were independent risk factors.Post-ICUadmission incident CRE colonization was associated with ICU B stay (OR 2.20; p = 0.013), broad-spectrum antibiotics (OR 1.90; p = 0.018), urinary catheter use (OR 2.33; p = 0.024), and shock (OR 1.91; p = 0.043).Hand hygiene compliance and Contact Precautions adherence were >80% across both units.Conclusion: CRE acquisition in ICU appears related to colonization pressure, antibiotic disruption, and specific device use.Prevention of CRE acquisition in high-prevalence ICUs likely requires interventions beyond to standard infection prevention and control measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: