Develops Energy-Efficiency Theory to explain learning and memory dynamics, suggesting new frameworks for cognitive understanding.
Learning and memory are central to cognition, yet traditional theories describe synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation without answering the ontological question: what is learning, and what is the physical nature of memory? This paper develops an interpretation within Energy-Efficiency Theory (EET). Starting from Yang's Axioms and the entropy decomposition S=Sc+Sf−ScorrS=Sc+Sf−Scorr, we propose that learning is the inverse-entropy consolidation of constrained-state energy texture, memory is the consolidated constrained-state energy texture, and forgetting is the natural dissipation of constrained-state entropy. We derive the learning rate from the inverse entropy formula S˙inv,learn=Pfree/TS˙inv,learn=Pfree/T (valid under steady-state cognitive conditions with Δt≥ΔtminΔt≥Δtmin), establish the memory strength dynamics dFmemdt=S˙inv,learn−λmemFmemdtdFmem=S˙inv,learn−λmemFmem, and distinguish passive from active forgetting within the EET framework. The paper connects to companion works including Information Is Not a Substance, Inertia Does No Work, The Ontology of Time, The Cognitive Buffer, The Ontology of Inverse Entropy, The Neural Buffer, The Ontology of Consciousness, and The Ontology of Spirit, forming a closed-loop theoretical system. Testable predictions with statistical criteria are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hongpu Yang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: