PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 30, 2026New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research0 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Alternative Sheep–Beef Enterprise Mixes on Farm Productivity, Profitability and Predicted Enteric Methane Emissions in North Island Hill Country Farms

View Full Paper
JAJoseph Ayetewene AdjabuiMassey UniversityPMP. C. H. MorelMassey UniversitySMStephen T. MorrisMassey University

Key Points

  • To evaluate how different sheep and cattle stock unit ratios affect farm productivity, profitability, and predicted methane emissions.
  • Used a system dynamics model of a representative North Island Hill Country sheep and beef farm.
  • Analyzed five different sheep-cattle stock unit scenarios.
  • Measured total liveweight, carcass weight equivalent, cash operating surplus, and methane emissions.
  • Increasing cattle stock units by 20% raised total liveweight sold by 0.5% and carcass weight equivalent by 3.3%.
  • Cash operating surplus increased by 10% with higher cattle stock units.
  • Predicted enteric methane emissions rose by 2.2% due to fewer lambs in the system.

Abstract

Sheep or beef cattle (cattle) share of total farm feed consumed, measured in stock units (SU) on New Zealand farms, is often adjusted depending on the profitability of each enterprise. The impact of these adjustments on whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted methane (CH 4) output has not been recently explored. A system dynamics model of a representative North Island Hill Country sheep and beef farm was parameterised to evaluate whole‐farm productivity, profitability and predicted CH 4 output simultaneously, while varying sheep and cattle SU. Five scenarios were considered: 80%: 20%, 60%: 40%, 50%: 50%, 40%: 60% and 20%: 80% sheep and cattle SU, respectively. For every 20% increase in cattle SU, on average, total liveweight and carcass weight equivalent (kg CWeq) sold increased by 0. 5% and 3. 3%, respectively, while cash operating surplus (COS) increased by 10%. However, predicted total enteric CH 4 emissions increased by 2. 2%, due to fewer lambs in the system, which have a lower emission factor, and farm economic emission efficiency (COS (NZ) /tCO 2 e) increased by 7. 5%. Overall, the results show that to increase COS, farmers should increase cattle SU. Although when considering a transition towards a higher proportion of cattle SU in the mixed system, they should also consider pasture management and environmental implications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adjabui et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ca1369883daed6ee0955afhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jag2.70058
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper