Retrospective analysis shows urine CXCL10 and dd-cfDNA effectively predict kidney transplant rejection, suggesting improved screening strategies.
Data suggests donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and urine CXCL10 outperform serum creatinine as a biomarker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). We hypothesized that combining these biomarkers would improve the overall detection of rejection. We performed a retrospective two-center, case-controlled study of 103 adult renal transplant recipients who had for-cause or surveillance biopsies with corresponding urine and plasma samples. Rejection was classified by Banff 2022 criteria. While log 10 %dd-cfDNA correlated more strongly than log 10 CXCL10 with glomerulitis (r = 0.55, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.25, p = 0.01) and peritubular capillaritis (r = 0.47, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.23, p = 0.02), log 10 CXCL10 was a better correlate of tubulitis (r = 0.28, p = 0.004 vs. r = 0.054, p = 0.59). Both dd-cfDNA > 0.5% (OR 21.9, 95% CI 3.74–180, p < 0.001) and de novo DSA (OR 10.4, 95% CI 1.16–157, p = 0.037) were independently associated with AMR vs. no rejection (NR), while log 10 serum creatinine and log 10 CXCL10 were not (p > 0.05). While dd-cfDNA >0.5% (OR 5.37, 95% CI 1.04–31.5, p = 0.047) was independently associated with Banff ≥1A TCMR vs. NR, log 10 CXCL10 was a significant predictor of TCMR in a model without %dd-cfDNA (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.09–10.4, p = 0.043). Biomarker-guided screening strategies based on dd-cfDNA and urine chemokines such as CXCL10 for AMR (microvascular injury) and TCMR (tubulitis) warrant further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fantus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: