Investigation compares cutting performance of multi-blade and diamond-wire gang saws, revealing economic and efficiency benefits of diamond-wire technology.
The objective of this study was to investigate the cutting performance of multi-blade and diamond-wire gang saws used in natural stone plants and to determine the more economical option. In the first phase, five different natural stones with varying physical-mechanical properties were cut using both gang saws, and key operational parameters were measured and compared, including cutting speed, bead/socket wear, energy consumption, water consumption, and surface quality of the slabs. The results revealed significant performance differences between the two cutting technologies. The diamond-wire gang saw achieved a cutting speed that was three times higher than that of the multi-blade gang saw. In terms of energy efficiency, a diamond-wire gang saw represents a 36% lower energy consumption than a multi-blade gang saw. The diamond-wire gang saw uses 50% less water than the multi-blade gang saw in terms of water consumption. In the second phase of the study, the ENTROPY-based TOPSIS method was applied to evaluate the two gang saws with respect to energy consumption, cutting quality, cutting time, and bead/socket wear. Consequently, based on this multi-criteria analysis, the diamond-wire gang saw was identified as the superior option, offering advantages in economic efficiency, cutting precision, and operational speed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdogan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: