PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 31, 2026Business Strategy & Development3 citations

Cost of Capital and Product Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Board Gender Diversity, ESG Controversies, and Institutional Ownership in Firms Listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange

View Full Paper
RARichard ArhinfulLMLeviticus Mensah

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how the cost of capital impacts product responsibility, considering various moderating factors.
  • Analyzed 227 firms listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange from 2002 to 2023.
  • Used data from Thomson Reuters Eikon DataStream and purposive sampling.
  • Employed Augmented Mean Group (AMG), Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS), and two-step Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) for analysis.
  • Cost of capital, reflected by Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), negatively impacts product responsibility.
  • Board gender diversity, ESG controversies, and institutional ownership enhance the negative effect of WACC on product responsibility.
  • Integration of cost of capital with ethical standards is essential for sustaining stakeholder trust.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The capacity of a firm to deliver high‐quality products is shaped by its cost of capital. Guided by signaling theory, this study examines the influence of the cost of capital on product responsibility, while also assessing the moderating roles of board gender diversity, ESG controversies, and institutional ownership. The analysis draws on data from 227 firms listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange between 2002 and 2023, sourced from Thomson Reuters Eikon DataStream and selected through purposive sampling. Methodologically, the study employs the Augmented Mean Group (AMG) estimator, Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS), and the two‐step Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to test the hypothesized relationships. Results indicate that the cost of capital, proxied by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), exerts a negative and statistically significant effect on product responsibility. Moreover, board gender diversity, ESG controversies, and institutional ownership significantly strengthen the relationship between WACC and product responsibility. These findings underscore the need for managers to integrate cost of capital considerations with the ethical and quality standards of their products. Such integration is essential for sustaining stakeholder trust, enhancing long‐term competitiveness, and safeguarding corporate reputation, particularly under financial constraints.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arhinful et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cb6589e6a8c024954b98fdhttps://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70321
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Corporate Use of Social Media After ESG Incidents2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2Exploring the relationship between sustainable business practices and increased brand loyalty2024 · 123 citations
  3. 3The influence of cost of debt, cost of equity and weighted average cost of capital on dividend policy decision: evidence from non-financial companies listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange2024 · 52 citations
  4. 4The Moderating Effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on the Relationship Between Working Capital Management and Profitability: Evidence from UK Non-Financial Firms2024 · 23 citations
  5. 5Environmental regulation and green investments: the role of green finance2020 · 246 citations