Simulations demonstrate enhanced efficiency and safety in power dispatch using new AI methods amidst renewable energy uncertainty.
To address the challenges posed by the strong uncertainty of high-proportion renewable energy sources (RES) to the secure and stable operation of distributed real-time power dispatch (D-RTPD) in new-type power systems, this paper proposes an integrated solution combining a neighborhood feature aggregation-based graph attention network (NFA-GAT) and multi-agent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG). First, the D-RTPD problem is modeled as a decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (Dec-POMDP), which effectively captures the stochastic game characteristics of multi-regional agents and the partial observability of grid states. Second, the NFA-GAT is designed to enhance agents’ perception of grid operating states: by introducing a spatial discount factor, it realizes rational aggregation of multi-order neighborhood information while modeling the attenuation of electrical quantity influence with topological distance. Third, a prior-guided mechanism is integrated into the MADDPG framework to eliminate constraint-violating actions by setting their actor logits to negative infinity, improving training efficiency and strategy reliability. Simulation validations on the IEEE 118-bus test system (75.2% RES installed capacity ratio) show that the proposed method achieves efficient training convergence. Compared with the multi-layer perceptron (MLP) structure, it attains higher cumulative reward values and scenario win rates. When compared with traditional model-driven (ADMM) and data-driven (Q-MIX) methods, the proposed method balances solution efficiency, operational safety (98.7% maximum line load rate, zero power flow violation rate), and economic performance ($12,845 daily dispatch cost), providing a reliable technical support for D-RTPD under high-proportion RES integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: