Cross-sectional research develops a reliable scale for evaluating occupational health and safety in food service settings, suggesting effective management.
Objective: This study aimed to develop a scale for evaluating sustainable occupational health and safety within food service systems, specifically institutions that provide food servicesMethods: The study was designed as cross-sectional and quantitative research. A total of 540 managerial kitchen staff employed in food service institutions across 22 provinces in Türkiye were included. The initial scale, comprising 56 items across 7 sub-dimensions, was piloted with 100 managerial kitchen personnel. Following the pilot, validity and reliability analyses were conducted, including assessments of internal consistency, item-total correlations, and item discrimination.Results: Based on factor and reliability analyses, the scale was refined to 37 items grouped under five sub-dimensions: “Emergency Preparedness,” “Training and Awareness,” “Physical Environment, Equipment, and Technology,” “Chemical and Biological Risks,” and “Legal Regulations and Legislation.” The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.986. The five-factor structure explained 78.66% of the total variance. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.962, and Bartlett’s test was statistically significant (χ² = 23366.314, p < 0.001).Conclusion: The findings indicate that the developed scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing sustainable occupational health and safety in food service systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baygut et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: