Data-first design study identifies connection types to improve interoperability of digital scholarly editions.
Digital scholarly editions hold considerable potential for reuse and open data sharing. However, their heterogeneity in structure, tag usage, and granularity makes cross-edition exploration difficult. Even edition experts with extensive knowledge of individual editions face barriers in connecting them. To address this, we conduct a data-first design study to identify commonalities across editions. We study six heterogeneous TEI-XML editions and collaborate with edition experts to abstract three high-level Connection Types: Time, Geo, and Tag. We present BridgED, an approach that combines interfaces for connectivity exploration and measures for computing edition connectivity. Each Connection Type has a computational measure that quantifies pairwise connectivity, enabling consistent comparison and edition bridging. Interactive visualizations per Connection Type support detailed exploration, complemented by a fourth view that summarizes pairwise connections across all editions and Connection Types. Our approach facilitates multi-edition integration and informs future directions on edition interoperability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachdeva et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: