Retrospective study evaluates hormonal effects of COVID-19 and vaccination in reproductive-aged women, suggesting no long-term impact.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether COVID-19 infection or COVID-19 mRNA vaccination affects ovarian reserve and reproductive hormone profiles in reproductive-aged women. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal (before–after observational) single-center study included women aged 16–44 years who presented to a tertiary center between January 2021 and September 2023. Participants either had a confirmed COVID-19 infection by a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test or had received two doses of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine without prior infection. Women with available ovarian reserve parameters within six months of infection or vaccination were included. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), prolactin (PRL), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), total testosterone, and free testosterone levels were evaluated at baseline and reassessed six months later. Menstrual cycle characteristics were recorded. Parametric and non-parametric statistical tests were applied as appropriate. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in AMH, FSH, LH, E2, PRL, TSH, total testosterone, or free testosterone levels before and after COVID-19 infection or vaccination (all p > 0.05). Comparisons between infection and vaccination groups across age subgroups (<25, 25–35, ≥35 years) revealed no significant differences in ovarian reserve parameters. Menstrual irregularities were reported in 38.0% of women following infection and 18.6% following vaccination. All reported menstrual changes were transient and resolved within six months. Conclusions: COVID-19 infection and mRNA vaccination were not associated with detrimental effects on ovarian reserve or reproductive hormone profiles. Although transient menstrual irregularities were observed, no long-term adverse reproductive impact was detected. Larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basibuyuk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: