This research compares GNSS receiver accuracy in varying vegetation conditions, indicating usability for resource management.
This research addresses the increasing demand for low-cost GNSS solutions in natural resources management and geodesy by comparing a dual-frequency RTK receiver and a single-frequency autonomous receiver under identical conditions. The novelty lies in the simultaneous testing of u-blox ZED-F9P and u-blox MAX-M10S receivers connected to a common antenna, eliminating different signal reception effects. The study also evaluates the horizontal accuracy and area determination accuracy and the influence of seasonal foliage. Experiments were conducted on three polygons with varying vegetation canopies during leaf-on and leaf-off periods. The ZED-F9P receiver demonstrated high accuracy and stability when using RTK corrections. Under canopy conditions, the average horizontal errors were 0.17–0.18 m during leaf-on and improved by 58% to approximately 0.07 m during leaf-off season. The average area determination errors remained below 2%, confirming its suitability for precise mapping. In contrast, the MAX-M10S receiver showed substantial variability under vegetation. Its average horizontal errors reached 1.5–3.0 m during leaf-on season, with the maximum errors exceeding 5 m. Its seasonal improvement ranged from 41 to 54%, while its area errors reached up to 14.7%. The study confirms that while vegetation cover and seasonal foliage are limiting factors for both types of devices, low-cost RTK receivers represent a viable alternative to expensive professional instruments, even in more challenging conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bene et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: