Compares YOLOv8 and YOLO11 for classifying sugar beet seeds, highlighting their effectiveness for early detection.
This study addresses the automatic classification of sugar beet seeds according to their spraying levels using RGB images, aiming to enable a fast, practical, and non-destructive early warning system without chemical analysis. A dataset of 16,519 seed images acquired under controlled lighting conditions was used to evaluate YOLOv8-CLS and YOLO11-CLS architectures, including the n, s, m, l, and x scale variants within the Ultralytics framework. All experiments were conducted using a 10-fold cross-validation strategy, with models trained under different batch size and learning rate configurations. The results indicate that both architectures achieve reliable performance, with accuracy values ranging from approximately 78–83% for YOLOv8-CLS and 80–82% for YOLO11-CLS models. ROC-AUC scores consistently above 0.94 demonstrate strong inter-class discrimination. Misclassification analysis shows that errors mainly occur between visually similar intermediate treatment levels, particularly 25% and 50%. Despite this challenge, low log-loss values and balanced precision–recall profiles indicate stable decision behavior. Overall, the findings confirm that sugar beet seed treatment levels can be effectively distinguished using only RGB imagery, providing a potentially low-cost and scalable approach for early warning and quality control in seed treatment processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ünal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: