Designs an optical system achieving constant ground resolution in LWIR for UAV applications, suggesting improved imaging performance.
Long-wave infrared (LWIR) airborne optical systems for ground imaging are widely utilized in applications such as ground reconnaissance, agricultural monitoring, counterterrorism, and other fields. Traditional oblique-view ground-imaging optical systems suffer from a critical drawback compared to nadir-view systems: the significant variation in object distances between distant and nearby targets. This disparity leads to inconsistent ground resolution (GR), manifesting in images where distant targets exhibit significantly lower resolution than nearby ones. This characteristic is highly detrimental to information acquisition and three-dimensional modeling of the system. Furthermore, the limited field of view of fixed focal length systems prevents the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) from acquiring target information effectively across varying flight altitudes. To address this issue, this paper designs an oblique imaging optical system capable of achieving both constant GR and zoom functionality in the LWIR band. By controlling the ground resolution, a LWIR continuous zoom optical system was designed. The system maintains constant GR over the entire field of view. Its modulation transfer function (MTF) approaches the diffraction limit across the full field of view, and the spot diagram remains within Airy’s disk at each view angle. The radius of the spot diagram is smaller than that of the Airy disk, indicating that the geometric aberrations of the system are well corrected. The imaging performance is primarily determined by the wavelength and the F-number. In the case of LWIR, the longer wavelength results in a larger Airy disk radius. The system meets imaging quality requirements and is suitable for air-to-ground target reconnaissance imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: