Part 2 explores phase evolution in cosmology, suggesting a framework to unify key theoretical problems.
In Part 1 of this series, Euler's formula e^(iπθ) and the identity |e^(iπθ)|² = 1 were established as the mathematical language for describing phase transitions. Part 1, however, treated the phase angle θ as a static constant, while the observed universe is not static. This study (Part 2) extends that framework by introducing a dynamical function θ(z) that describes how the phase angle evolves with cosmological redshift z, and by defining the core dynamical parameter γ(z) — "Phase Tension" — as the spacetime resistance and elasticity arising when imaginary energy converts into real matter. The structural isomorphism between e's self-referential property d/dx(eˣ) = eˣ and fractal self-similarity provides the geometric basis for this extension. Building on Part 1 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19158235), Part 2 moves from pure mathematical foundations to cosmological dynamics, introducing boundary conditions derived from Planck 2018 data and comparing integral-averaged predictions with DESI 2024 BAO observations. Core equations established in Part 2:- d/dx(eˣ) = eˣ — self-referential structure of e- θ(z) = 0.5 − 0.191·(1+z)^(−γ(z)) — phase evolution function- Ωm,CPC,int(z) = (1/z)·∫₀ᶻ cos²(πθ(z′)) dz′ — integral average of matter density Using the geometric reference value γ₀ ≈ 0.15 for the present universe, this integral average Ωm,CPC,int(z) corresponds to Ωm = 0.295 ± 0.015 reported by DESI over the range z = 0–0.9. This research applies Juridical Structuring Methodology to cosmology, crossing traditional academic boundaries to propose a strictly falsifiable scientific framework.
Loading...
Sujeong Yu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: