Assesses fat fraction and atrophy in the supraspinatus muscle using different MRI views, indicating an optimal selection for accuracy.
Purpose: To assess the accuracy of supraspinatus muscle fat fraction and atrophy measured on the Y-view compared with the newly proposed fossa-view sagittal MRI plane.Materials and Methods: This study included 84 patients (36 male; mean age, 65.1 10.1 years) who underwent shoulder MRI with extended oblique sagittal T1-weighted and three-dimensional (3D) six-echo Dixon imaging between December 2020 and November 2022.The reference fat fraction was calculated by integrating voxel-wise Dixon values, while supraspinatus muscle volume was quantified using a 3D nnU-Net algorithm and normalized to the scapular volume to derive the standardized muscle index (SMI).Fat fraction and cross-sectional area were quantified on the Y-view and fossaview and compared with the reference values.Subgroup analyses were performed using fatty degeneration and retraction grades.Results: Agreement with the reference fat fraction was significantly higher for the fossa-view (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.923) than for the Y-view (ICC, 0.822; p = 0.006).The fossa-view showed smaller deviations and narrower limits of agreement.For SMI, the Y-view (ICC, 0.782) showed higher agreement than the fossa-view (ICC, 0.694), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.219).Subgroup analyses showed better Y-view performance at lower retraction grades and better fossa-view performance at higher grades, although the differences were not statistically significant (all p > 0.05).Conclusion: Both planes reliably quantified the fat fraction with greater accuracy in the fossa-view.However, single-plane assessment of muscle atrophy was less reliable, underscoring the need for MRI evaluation of the entire muscle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: