Key result
Inhaled nitric oxide safely drops pulmonary vascular resistance by ~44% in PH-LHD.
Why the study?
The safety and utility of inhaled nitric oxide for acute vasodilator challenge in HTx candidates with PH-LHD remain unclear.
Does acute vasodilator challenge with inhaled nitric oxide safely evaluate pulmonary hemodynamic reversibility in patients with PH-LHD referred for heart transplantation?
Observational (n=18)
No
Does acute vasodilator challenge with inhaled nitric oxide safely evaluate pulmonary hemodynamic reversibility in patients with PH-LHD referred for heart transplantation?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.9% vs 5.2%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Acute vasodilator challenge with inhaled nitric oxide is safe and effectively evaluates pulmonary vascular resistance reversibility, which may predict hemodynamic response to LVAD implantation in patients with PH-LHD.
iNO safely reduces PVR during testing in PH-LHD; leaves open whether reversibility predicts post-transplant outcomes in prospective studies.
Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) in heart transplantation (HTx) candidates is associated with increased post-transplant mortality. Although guidelines recommend acute vasodilator challenge (AVC) with nitroprusside or milrinone, the safety and utility of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) for AVC in this setting remain unclear.We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with PH-LHD referred for HTx who underwent AVC with iNO. While arterial oxygen saturation decreased after AVC (95.4 ± 2.6 to 94.1 ± 2.7%, P = 0.013), there were no significant changes in mean aortic pressure (74.5 ± 9.8 versus 74.0 ± 8.0 mmHg, P = 0.680), and no respiratory or circulatory adverse events occurred. Both mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) significantly decreased (mPAP: 36.1 ± 8.0 to 33.2 ± 7.5 mmHg, P = 0.007; PVR: 5.2 ± 2.9 to 2.9 ± 1.3 Wood Units [WU], P < 0.001). Nine patients subsequently underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. At 1 month after implantation, PVR decreased from pre-AVC levels (4.0 ± 1.6 to 2.9 ± 1.3 WU, P = 0.049). The percent change in PVR from pre-AVC to post-LVAD correlated with the percent change from pre-AVC to post-AVC (r = 0.76, P = 0.029).Our preliminary findings suggest that AVC with iNO may be a useful method for evaluating the reversibility of elevated PVR and could indicate the hemodynamic response to LVAD implantation in patients with PH-LHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morishita et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) (n=18). Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) vs. Pre-challenge baseline was evaluated on Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (p=< 0.001). Acute vasodilator challenge with inhaled nitric oxide significantly reduced pulmonary vascular resistance from 5.2 to 2.9 Wood Units (P < 0.001) without adverse events in patients with PH-LHD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: