Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research-practice partnerships improve reading accuracy in classrooms, suggesting effective instructional strategies.
In many schools, the number of students identified as needing support in reading is greater than 20%, and providing Tier 2 prevention to that large number of students is counterproductive. Although recommendations to improve Tier 1 reading instruction according to reading screening data are straightforward, there are few examples of implementation that are both empirically supported and descriptive enough to replicate. This study describes a research-practice partnership in an underpowered randomized controlled trial with 16 grade 2 classrooms to describe the relations of Tier 1 supports on both teacher and student outcomes. Results showed a small practical effect (Hedges’s g = 0.20) on students’ reading accuracy. To help other schools evaluate their Tier 1 reading practices, we demonstrate the use of a logic model and an observation/coaching tool—the Instructional Content Emphasis–Revised—as mechanisms to align students’ reading development with instructional quality and coaching practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valentine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: