Field study evaluates RPA's effectiveness in cancer registry data abstraction, indicating promising efficiency gains.
Background/Objectives: Robotic Process Automation (RPA) offers a potential solution for reducing the manual burden of clinical data abstraction, yet empirical evidence of its effectiveness in real-world electronic health record (EHR)-integrated cancer registries remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the post-implementation effectiveness of RPA for cancer registry data abstraction in a tertiary hospital and to explore multidisciplinary stakeholder perceptions regarding its deployment. Methods: We implemented RPA for gastric and breast cancer registries within a production EHR system. Quantitative effectiveness was evaluated by comparing per-patient data extraction time using descriptive statistics. To ensure data integrity, all RPA-extracted outputs were entirely verified manually by researchers against source records. Qualitatively, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants and analyzed via thematic analysis based on the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARiHS) framework (Evidence, Context, and Facilitation). Results: RPA was applied to 70 gastric cancer variables and 83 breast cancer variables. For the gastric cancer registry, the mean abstraction time per patient decreased by 74% (19.5 ± 3.0 to 5.1 ± 1.8 min). For the breast cancer registry, time decreased by 30% (25.4 ± 6.9 to 17.8 ± 5.5 min). Based on 2024 surgical volumes, this translates to an estimated saving of over 260 h of manual labor per year. Qualitative findings revealed that while participants recognized RPA as ideal for repetitive tasks, successful implementation was contingent on clinician cooperation and continuous output monitoring. Conclusions: RPA implementation significantly improved data abstraction efficiency in a real-world clinical research workflow. The disparity in time savings highlights that efficiency gains are contingent upon registry complexity. While formal quantitative assessments of data accuracy were not performed, RPA is a readily deployable tool for enhancing clinical data workflows when aligned with organizational readiness and robust monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: