Identifies knee wobbling differences in squatting and landing tasks, implying potential ACL injury risks.
[Objective] The purpose of this study was to detect the differences in the presence and movement of a knee wobbling phenomenon (KWP) during four squatting and landing tasks in order to establish the optimal screening task for identifying a potential indicator of ACL injury risk. [Background] KWP consists of quick and uncontrollable medio-lateral movements(valgus/varus) of the knee,which may indicate an elevated risk for ACL injury. [Materials &Methods] Ten female collegiate athletes participated in this study. Slow single leg squat(SSLS) ,single leg standing(SLS), double leg drop landing from a 30-cm box(DLB),and repeated single leg landing after jumping(RSLJ) were analyzed. Relative valgus(frontal) angular velocity divided by flexion(sagittal) angular velocity(F/S ratio) was calculated. An F/S ratio exceeding 100% was defined as “F/S spike” indicating KWP. [Results] The number of valgus and varus F/S spikes were significantly different between the four tasks (p<.001). The median(range) of the initial knee flexion angles during SSLS,SLS,DLB,and RSLJ was 0.1(0-4.3)°,9.1(3.8-14.5)°,25.5(13.6-46.9)°,and 19.6(14.4-34.5)°,respectively(p<.001). The median for the number of F/S spikes during each task was 4.5(0.3-7.3), 5.9(4.6-7.0), 0, and 0(0-0.5) times,respectively (p<.001). [Conclusion] SSLS and SLS induced knee wobbling at low knee flexion angles(i.e.<25°), which facilitated recognition of the characteristics of knee movement at low flexion angles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
青木 et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: