Examines the effect of social capital on life satisfaction, indicating its importance across countries.
This study examines the associations between three types of social capital (network size, social participation, and general trust) and subjective well-being (life satisfaction). Data were derived from the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 2017 cross-sectional surveys. A total of 33,799 individuals clustered from 29 countries were analyzed. Based on multilevel modeling, this study identifies that social capital positively predicts life satisfaction at the individual level. Additionally, individualism-collectivism is negatively related to life satisfaction at the country level. Furthermore, the effect of network size on life satisfaction depends on the degree of individualism-collectivism in each country. However, the effects of other social capital, social participation and general trust, on life satisfaction were not affected by the degree of individualism-collectivism at the country level. These research results suggest that among social capital, only network size has a relationship with subjective well-being that varies depending on social psychological factors. This study provides implications for the role of social capital among social determinants of life satisfaction and socio-psychological characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Areum Shin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: