PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine3 citationsOpen Access

Hemolysis in Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Narrative Review

ACAngelica CersosimoNPNicola PierucciMMMarco Valerio Mariani

Key Result

Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation induces intravascular hemolysis, with procedures exceeding 90 to 100 applications significantly increasing the risk of acute kidney injury.

Key Points

  • This review examines the hemolysis mechanisms linked to pulsed field ablation and outlines prevention strategies for acute kidney injury.
  • Narrative review methodology
  • Overview of hemolysis mechanisms during pulsed field ablation
  • Summary of procedural variables affecting hemolysis
  • Evaluation of hydration strategies to reduce acute kidney injury
  • Pulsed field ablation can cause hemolysis due to electrical pulses leading to red blood cell lysis.
  • Increased hemolysis correlates with higher peak output voltage and more energy applications.
  • Adequate preprocedural hydration effectively reduces acute kidney injury incidence.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
Pulsed field ablation (PFA)
O
Outcome
Hemolysis and acute kidney injury (AKI)safety

Hemolysis is a frequent consequence of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation that can lead to acute kidney injury, highlighting the need for preventive strategies like preprocedural hydration and limiting the number of applications.

Limitations

  • Limited available literature on the relationship between hemolysis and AKI following PFA
  • Nonspecific hemolysis markers used in some studies may not accurately reflect the true incidence of hemolysis
  • Confounding factors like hypotension during general anesthesia were not uniformly controlled in the reviewed comparative studies

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising non-thermal energy source for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), demonstrating comparable efficacy to traditional thermal ablation techniques while offering an improved safety profile. However, recent evidence suggests that PFA may be associated with intravascular hemolysis, a complication that can potentially lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of hemolysis associated with PFA and to summarize current strategies to mitigate the risk of AKI. The delivery of high-voltage electrical pulses during PFA can induce red blood cell lysis, resulting in elevated circulating free hemoglobin. The extent of hemolysis has been shown to correlate with several procedural variables, including peak output voltage, catheter-tissue contact quality, and, particularly, the number of energy applications delivered. Recent studies have highlighted that adequate preprocedural hydration may effectively reduce the incidence of AKI by promoting renal clearance of hemolytic products. Although hemolysis appears to be an unavoidable effect of pulsed field ablation, the clinical consequences associated with hemolysis, particularly AKI, can be significantly reduced with preventive measures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cersosimo et al. (2026) conducted a review in Atrial Fibrillation. Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) vs. Thermal ablation (Radiofrequency or Cryoablation) was evaluated on Intravascular hemolysis and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation induces intravascular hemolysis, with procedures exceeding 90 to 100 applications significantly increasing the risk of acute kidney injury.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7af55652765b073a883dhttps://doi.org/10.31083/rcm46485
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper