Employs a deep learning model to enhance emphysema detection in patients, indicating better diagnostic accuracy.
Permanent deterioration of the lung’s parenchyma is a characteristic of pulmonary emphysema, also known as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and is a disability and primary cause of death in developed nations. Emphysema represents a key contributing factor to this condition. The early identification of this condition is therefore more important and may even save lives. Furthermore, a life-saving technique is significant that aims to simplify patient care is non-invasive controlled breathing. Hence, this work aims to employ the deep learning model to diagnose the disorder effectively and significantly. First, the required Computed Tomography (CT) images are collected from publicly available datasets: local clinical cohort and Computed Tomography Emphysema Database. Then, the cleaning task is done using the Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalisation (CLAHE) and bilateral filtering, where the pre-processed image is achieved. Subsequently, the resultant images are fed into a segmentation network named Transformer Recurrent Residual U-net (TR2Unet). Finally, the segmented region is subjected to the classification model of Adaptive Residual DenseNet (ARes-DNet), in which the hyper-parameter optimisation is done by using an Improved Mother Optimisation Algorithm (IMOA). Hence, the newly recommended model is examined with various measures such as dice coefficient, accuracy, IoU, jaccard coefficient, precision and NPV, demonstrating superior performance in both segmentation and classification operations. Thus, this framework provides a promising solution for faster, highly accurate emphysema diagnosis, greatly improving patient outcomes via earlier detection and focused treatment. The proposed model attains 98.5% accuracy while analysing with dataset-1 and similarly, higher performance has been achieved in dataset-2 analysis with 98.7%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramalingam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: