Assessment reveals forest canopy height products' accuracy and consistency across China, suggesting improvements for mapping methods.
Large-scale mapping of forest canopy height (FCH) is crucial for accurately understanding ecosystem succession and forest carbon sinks. Recently, three high-resolution FCH products have been released, including global forest canopy height (GFCH), NNGI_FCH_China (NNGI_FCH), and ETH_GlobalCanopyHeight (ETH_GCH). This study provides a detailed assessment of these FCH products across China from forest area, spatial consistency, and overall accuracy, with additional analyses of forest classification errors and evaluation under a unified forest mask. The assessment is conducted using forest inventory data, the China land cover dataset, and field measurement data. The results show that NNGI_FCH had the smallest relative error of 13.4% and achieved better estimates of forest area in all regions but the north and northeast regions. GFCH had the highest spatial consistency of 70.8% nationwide, followed by NNGI_FCH (69.7%), which performed slightly better than GFCH in the east and northwest regions. ETH_GCH exhibited the lowest spatial consistency of 35.6% and remained below 50% across all regions except the northeast and south regions. ETH_GCH demonstrated the highest overall accuracy across the country, with an R2 and RMSE of 0.56 and 4.14 m, followed by NNGI_FCH (R2 = 0.49, RMSE = 3.38 m) and GFCH (R2 = 0.48, RMSE = 3.38 m). Validation results of ETH_GCH were relatively stable in different regions of China, while those of NNGI_FCH varied more but still outperformed GFCH. This study offers valuable insights by evaluating large-scale FCH products, which will be a key basis for in-depth studies on the utilization and improvement of future FCH mapping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: