Evaluates the psychometric properties of the DRS-15 in first responders, indicating its reliability for psychological hardiness assessment.
Hardiness, a psychological resilience trait comprising commitment, control, and challenge, has been widely studied in high-stress occupational groups. However, limited research has evaluated the psychometric properties of the Dispositional Resilience Scale-15 (DRS-15) in low- and middle-income contexts. This study investigated the psychometric of the DRS-15 in a sample of South African first responders ( n = 429). Psychometric paradigms used included Classical Test Theory (CTT), Mokken scale analysis (MSA), and Rasch modeling. MSA and confirmatory factor analyses supported a unidimensional structure for the DRS-15. Item 4 exhibited poor psychometric performance across Rasch, MSA and CTT indices. The DRS without item 4 demonstrated strong internal consistency, satisfactory item-total correlations and factor loadings. The DRS without item 4 is a reliable and valid measure of psychological hardiness among South African first responders. Findings highlight the utility of integrating various complementary psychometric paradigms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pretorius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: