PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2026Technologies1 citationsOpen Access

Use of Machine Learning for Solar Power Generation Prediction in the Field of Alternative Renewable Energy Sources

View Full Paper
JPJuan David Parra-QuinteroFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludDODaniel Ovalle-CerqueraFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la SaludECE. Chica

Key Points

  • To predict daily solar irradiance using machine learning techniques for optimizing renewable energy planning in Colombia.
  • Applied supervised learning techniques using decision tree and artificial neural network models.
  • Utilized a dataset of 366 daily solar records from the NASA POWER database.
  • Employed statistical techniques for data cleaning, including moving-window median for outlier treatment.
  • Evaluated model performance with metrics like MAE, RMSE, and R2 using 90% training and 10% testing split.
  • The decision tree model outperformed the artificial neural network with R2 = 0.8882 versus R2 = 0.7679.
  • Lower MAE and RMSE values were observed for the decision tree model, indicating better predictive accuracy.
  • The findings support the development of sustainable energy policies in intermediate cities.

Abstract

This study focused on the application of supervised learning in the field of renewable energy, specifically for predicting daily solar irradiance in Neiva, department of Huila, Colombia. To this end, decision tree and artificial neural network (DT and ANN, respectively) models were trained and tested using the online tool Google Colab. The main objective was based on the need to optimize energy planning processes at local and regional levels, motivated by the increase in demand for the integration of non-conventional energy sources and the spatial–temporal variability in solar resources in the country. A dataset consisting of 366 daily records for the year 2024 was obtained from the NASA POWER database at the geographic coordinates (2.930079, −75.255650) and used for training and evaluating the proposed models. Statistical and cleaning techniques were used, including the treatment of outliers using the moving-window median for the latter. Metrics, such as mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2), were used to evaluate the models. Data inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to ensure the quality and validity of the observations. Model performance was evaluated using a randomized Hold-Out validation strategy (90% training and 10% testing), which was repeated across multiple iterations. The performance metrics reported corresponded to the 10th iteration of the validation process after outlier treatment. Under this configuration, the DT model achieved a higher predictive performance (R2 = 0.8882) compared with the ANN model (R2 = 0.7679), demonstrating its effectiveness as a reliable approach for estimating daily solar irradiance under the studied conditions. This result was also confirmed by the decreased MAE and RMSE for the DT model, which indicated that this model performed better in predicting the real values than the ANN model. Finally, the added value of the study is to consolidate national evidence and open access tools to facilitate the development of sustainable energy policies in intermediate cities such as Neiva.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parra-Quintero et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd7b575652765b073a93e3https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14040206
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper