This retrospective comparison analyzes refractive errors in albinos versus those with idiopathic congenital nystagmus, suggesting implications for refractive development.
We compared retrospectively the distribution of refractive errors in a sample of adolescent and adult albinos (n = 19) with that in persons with idiopathic congenital nystagmus (CN) (n = 46), whose eye movements are similar to those of albinos but whose visual acuity is better. The distribution of spherical‐equivalent refractive errors is more broadly distributed and slightly less myopic in albinos than in persons with idiopathic CN. On average, albinos also have more astigmatism (primarily with‐the‐rule), than persons with idiopathic CN. Unlike the leptokurtic distribution of refractive error that characterizes the normal adolescent and adult population, the distributions of refractive error for albinos and for persons with idiopathic CN exhibit no significant kurtosis. Moreover, neither group of subjects exhibits significant kurtosis for refractive errors in the vertical meridian, which corresponds to the retinal‐image orientation with the least motion smear during horizontal nystagmus. The absence of significant leptokurtosis in the refractive‐error distributions of young‐adult albinos and persons with idiopathic CN suggests that the presence of nystagmus may interfere with normal refractive development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sampath et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: