Key result
Heparin substitution during proctological surgery linked to ~18-fold greater postoperative hemorrhage risk vs other strategies.
Why the study?
The optimal perioperative antithrombotic treatment regimen for patients undergoing proctological surgery was not clearly established.
Does continuation of antithrombotic treatment prevent postoperative hemorrhage compared to heparin substitution in patients undergoing proctological surgery?
Cohort (n=1,128)
No
Does continuation of antithrombotic treatment prevent postoperative hemorrhage compared to heparin substitution in patients undergoing proctological surgery?
Continuation of existing antithrombotic treatment appears to be a safer perioperative strategy for proctological surgery compared to heparin substitution, which significantly increases the risk of postoperative hemorrhage.
Favors antithrombotic continuation over heparin substitution in proctological surgery; reinforces low-certainty evidence against bridging.
Background: This retrospective study attempted to identify the optimal perioperative antithrombotic treatment regimen for proctological surgery. Methods: From April 2008 to August 2014, 529 patients (351 males and 178 females) underwent proctological surgery. Of these 529 patients, 73 (13.8%) received preoperative antithrombotic treatment. Perioperatively, antithrombotic treatment was unchanged for 26 patients, switched to heparin for 38 patients, and withdrawn for 9 patients. Results: Postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 18 of the 529 patients (3.4%). No uncontrolled intraoperative bleeding was reported, and there were no intraoperative deaths. The incidence of postoperative hemorrhage was 1/26 (3.8%) in the antithrombotic drug continuation group, 14/38 (36.8%) in the heparin substitution group, 0/9 (0%) in the antithrombotic treatment discontinuation group, and 3/456 (0.7%) in the control group. The risk factors for hemorrhage were heparin substitution (p < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 14.557-166.588; odds ratio 49.241) and operative time (p = 0.050; 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.025; odds ratio 1.013). Conclusions: The incidence of thromboembolism caused by preoperative discontinuation of antithrombotic treatment was very low; however, thromboembolism can result in serious complications. Heparin substitution was associated with the highest incidence of postoperative hemorrhage; thus, continuation of existing antithrombotic treatment appears to be a safer perioperative antithrombotic strategy for proctological surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akiharu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Proctological surgery (n=1,128). Heparin substitution vs. Antithrombotic continuation, discontinuation, or no antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on Postoperative hemorrhage (OR 18.000, 95% CI 5.610-57.700, p=<0.001). Heparin substitution during proctological surgery significantly increased the risk of postoperative hemorrhage (OR 18.000) compared to other perioperative antithrombotic strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: