Key result
Perioperative antithrombotic therapy in gastrointestinal surgery showed a non-significant trend toward increased postoperative bleeding (OR 1.64) but significantly increased transfusion requirements.
Why the study?
Antithrombotic therapy poses significant challenges in the perioperative setting of GI surgery due to the competing risks of bleeding and thrombosis.
Does perioperative antithrombotic therapy increase bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,107)
Does perioperative antithrombotic therapy increase bleeding or transfusion requirements in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.64 (95% CI 0.98–2.75)
p-value: p=0.061
Perioperative antithrombotic therapy during GI surgery significantly increases the need for blood transfusions without a significant reduction in thromboembolic events, emphasizing the need for individualized risk assessment.
Supports individualized antithrombotic decisions in GI surgery; confirms transfusion risk elevation in meta-analysis.
Antithrombotic therapy is commonly prescribed for the prevention and management of thromboembolic diseases but poses significant challenges in the perioperative setting of gastrointestinal (GI) surgery due to the competing risks of bleeding and thrombosis. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with perioperative antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing GI surgery. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine studies comprising 13,107 patients were included. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative bleeding, thromboembolic events, and blood transfusion requirements. Statistical analysis was performed using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, and outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The pooled analysis showed a non-significant trend toward increased postoperative bleeding in patients on antithrombotic therapy (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.98-2.75, p = 0.061). Thromboembolic events did not differ significantly between groups (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.41-2.04, p = 0.82), with low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). However, transfusion requirements were significantly higher in the antithrombotic group (OR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.19-6.95, p = 0.019), indicating an increased need for intraoperative or postoperative blood products. While continuation of aspirin monotherapy appeared relatively safe in elective settings, dual antiplatelet therapy and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were associated with greater bleeding risks, particularly in complex or minimally invasive procedures. These findings suggest that with careful patient selection and perioperative planning, antithrombotic therapy can often be safely managed during GI surgery. However, individualized risk assessment remains critical to minimize adverse outcomes. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to establish clear guidelines for antithrombotic management in this surgical population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tariq et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery (n=13,107). Perioperative antithrombotic therapy vs. No antithrombotic therapy or modified regimen (discontinuation or bridging) was evaluated on Postoperative bleeding (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.98-2.75, p=0.061). Perioperative antithrombotic therapy in gastrointestinal surgery showed a non-significant trend toward increased postoperative bleeding (OR 1.64) but significantly increased transfusion requirements.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: