Key result
Continuous antiplatelet therapy during gastrointestinal procedures was not associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding compared to no or interrupted therapy in 17 of 22 included studies.
Why the study?
Does continuous antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Systematic Review
Does continuous antiplatelet therapy increase the risk of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuing antiplatelet therapy during gastrointestinal procedures does not significantly increase bleeding risk in the majority of studies, supporting its continuation in patients with cardiovascular indications.
BACKGROUND: Management of perioperative antiplatelet medications in gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is challenging. The risk of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding is associated with perioperative use of antiplatelet medication. However, cessation of these drugs may be unsafe for patients who are required to maintain antiplatelet use due to cardiovascular conditions. The objective of this systematic review was to compare the risk of intraoperative or postoperative bleeding among patients who had GI surgery while on continuous antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, or dual therapy) with the risk among those not taking continuous antiplatelet medication. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed articles published between January 2000 and July 2015 from the Medline Ovid and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases. Studies involving any GI procedures were included if the articles met our inclusion criteria (listed in Methods). The following key words were used for the search: clopidogrel, Plavix, aspirin, antiplatelet, bleeding, hemorrhage, and digestive system surgical procedures. Quality of the studies was assessed, depending on their study design, using the Newcastle-Ottawa score or the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Five showed that the risk of intraoperative bleeding or postoperative bleeding among patients who had GI surgery while on continuous antiplatelet therapy was higher compared that for those not on continuous therapy. The remaining 17 studies reported that there was no statistically significant difference in the risks of bleeding between the continuous antiplatelet therapy group and the group without continuous antiplatelet therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of bleeding associated with GI procedures in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy was not significantly higher than in patients with no antiplatelet or interrupted antiplatelet therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review in Gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. Continuous antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, or dual therapy) vs. No antiplatelet or interrupted antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. Continuous antiplatelet therapy during gastrointestinal procedures was not associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding compared to no or interrupted therapy in 17 of 22 included studies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: