Experiment tests how achievement motivation affects performance in a juggling task, suggesting implications for learning techniques.
This study was aimed at testing the hypothesis that those who have high need for achievement (High n Ach group) would show higher performance in the spontaneous learning of a ball juggling task than those who have low need for achievement (Low n Ach group). Mehrabian Measure of Achieving Tendency was used to classify the subjects into High and Low n Ach groups. All subjects were given the jugging task with three tennis balls and were tested on how many catches they could juggle on one week later. The High n Ach group showed significantly high scores on the task motivation scale than the Low n Ach group (p<.05). Both High and Low n Ach groups showed significant increase in performance during one week (p<.01). However, there was no difference between the High and Low n Ach groups concerning other dependent variables in the process of the learning. These results did not support the hypothesis. Some reasons for the inconsistency were discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamotsu Nishida (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: