Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals the impact of lumen area changes on stent expansion criteria in patients, suggesting the need for repeated measurements.
Intravascular ultrasound is an established method to optimize stent implantation. Stent expansion is estimated from the relation between minimal in-stent cross-sectional area and reference lumen area. We analyzed the periprocedural lumen increment in the reference segments and its impact on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for optimized stenting. Seventy-five consecutive patients were studied with a 2.9 Fr, 30-MHz system and motorized pullback (0.5 mm/sec). Lumen area was measured by planimetry; absolute and relative differences in area (delta area) were calculated. Lumen area increment for reference segments proximal and distal to the stent was 6.4% +/- 10.3% and 6.1% +/- 10.8%; 49/75 patients fulfilled all IVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion at the final IVUS assessment, and 10/75 patients met all the IVUS criteria in relation to the first measurement of reference lumen area, but not in relation to the final measurement of reference lumen area. During high-pressure dilatation within the stent, reference lumen increment is visible. If reference lumen planimetry is not repeated after additional high-pressure balloon inflation, the final relative stent expansion may be overestimated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regar et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: