Key result
StentBoost enhancement yields maximum stent diameter measurements comparable to IVUS.
Why the study?
Does StentBoost enhancement provide comparable evaluation of stent expansion to intravascular ultrasound in elective percutaneous coronary interventions?
Observational
Does StentBoost enhancement provide comparable evaluation of stent expansion to intravascular ultrasound in elective percutaneous coronary interventions?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.55% vs 3.45%
p-value: p=0.53
StentBoost enhancement provides comparable measurements of stent expansion to IVUS and is superior to QCA, offering a useful angiographic tool to guide post-stent dilatation.
BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is one of the standards for detection of stent underexpansion (de Feyter et al. 1999; Mintz et al., 2001). StentBoost (SB) enhancement allows an improved angiographic visualization of the stent (Koolen et al., 2005). AIM OF WORK: Comparison of stent expansion by IVUS and SB enhancement and detection of value of SB to guide dilatation post stent deployment. METHODOLOGY: [(maximum stent diameter minus minimum stent diameter) divided by maximum stent diameter]. RESULTS: The Max SD was (3.45 ± 0.62 vs 3.55 ± 0.56 vs 2.97 ± 0.59) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Max SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .009) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .53). The Min SD was (2.77 ± 0.53 vs 2.58 ± 0.56 vs 1.88 ± 0.60) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. Min SD was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .07). The stent symmetry index was (0.24 ±0.09 vs 0.34 ± 0.09 vs 0.14 ±0.27) by IVUS vs SB vs QCA respectively. It was significantly higher by IVUS vs QCA (p .001) and between SB vs QCA (p .001) while there was nonsignificant difference between IVUS vs SB (p .32). SB was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.74) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.68). QCA was positively correlated with IVUS measurements of Max SD correlation (p < .0001 & r 0.69) and Min SD (p < .0001 & r 0.63). QCA was positively correlated with SB measurements of Max SD (p < .0001 & r 0.61) and Min SD (p .003 & r 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: StentBoost enhancement has superior correlations for stent expansion measured by IVUS when compared with QCA. SB enhancement improved stent visualization and identification of stent underexpansion to guide stent postdilatation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laimoud et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Elective percutaneous coronary interventions. StentBoost enhancement vs. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) was evaluated on Maximum stent diameter (Max SD) (p=0.53). StentBoost enhancement provided maximum stent diameter measurements comparable to intravascular ultrasound (3.55 vs 3.45; p=0.53) and correlated positively with IVUS measurements (r=0.74, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: