In vitro research compares water sorption and solubility in two dental materials, suggesting key material properties.
The purpose of this research was to determine and compare the impact of light curing on the water sorption and solubility properties of alkasite and bulk-fill glass hybrid materials.An alkasite self-adhesive bulk-fill material (Cention R N, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein; CEN) and a bulk-fill glass material hybrid (EQUIA Forte HT, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan; EFT) were utilized.Each material was prepared in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.Specimens were placed in disk-shaped molds and divided into two subgroups: light-cured (LC) and non-light-cured (NLC) (n = 5).Sorption and solubility tests were performed in accordance with ISO 4049 standards.Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA, Tamhane's T2 post hoc, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and independent samples t-tests (p < 0.05).The highest water sorption was observed in Group EFT (63.022 6.772 g/mm 3 ), while the lowest was observed in Group CEN (4.447 0.412 g/mm 3 ).No significant differences were detected among Groups CEN and CEN LC and Groups EFT and EFT LC (p > 0.05).Regarding water solubility, Group EFT LC (-99.534 2.008 g/mm 3 ) exhibited the lowest values, while Group CEN (-2.728 0.499 g/mm 3 ) demonstrated the highest values.No significant difference was found between Group CEN and CEN LC (p > 0.05), while a statistically significant difference was found between Group EFT and Group EFT LC (p < 0.05).A statistically significant difference was identified between Group CEN and Group EFT and between Group CEN LC and Group EFT LC in terms of both water sorption and solubility values (p < 0.05).The correlation analysis found no significant relationship between the sorption and solubility values for the materials examined (p > 0.05).Regarding water sorption, the self-adhesive bulk-fill material was superior to the bulk-fill glass hybrid material, whether light-cured or not.For water solubility, the bulk-fill glass hybrid material was superior to the self-adhesive bulk-fill material, whether lightcured or not.The bulk-fill glass hybrid material exhibited reduced resistance to water sorption but a positive characteristic for water solubility.This short-term in vitro study provides a foundation for the evaluation of early-stage water-material interaction, which is essential for comprehending the behaviour of the material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KAZAK et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: