Investigates odor identification and naming abilities in children, suggesting methods to assess cognitive development.
Introduction: Odor processing provides a unique window into the interaction between perception, language, and memory during development. Aim: This study investigated how children aged 4-10 identify and name odors, focusing on age-related changes, potential gender differences, and priming effects between recognition and naming. Materials and methods: Using a cross-sectional experimental design, we measured both accuracy and response times for odor identification and naming. Children identified on average 5 odors (17.62 s) and named 4 (13.14 s), with mint and coffee being most reliably recognized and rose and banana least. Age robustly predicted both identification (R = 0.14) and naming performance (R = 0.24), whereas gender exerted no influence. Notably, prior identification facilitated subsequent naming, particularly in older children, consistent with the idea that semantic activation supports lexical access. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that olfactory cognition develops significantly during middle childhood, highlighting odor naming as a sensitive marker of the integration between perceptual and linguistic systems. Conclusions: Beyond descriptive patterns, our results suggest that odor-based paradigms can serve as a powerful tool for probing mechanisms of semantic development and may inform early detection of atypical cognitive trajectories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamerlińska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: