Examines digital reforms to mitigate land fraud in Zimbabwe, suggesting enhancements from Kenya’s model.
This study examines Zimbabwe's Deeds Registries Regulations, Statutory Instrument 76 of 2025 as a legislative foundation for mitigating syndicated land fraud through strategic adoption of Kenya's Ardhisasa digital governance model.Employing qualitative documentary analysis of Zimbabwean litigation trends (Zavazava, Mutumbuka, Chirimuta, Mariko) and regulatory frameworks within the e-governance paradigm, the research identifies Sections 40-44's mandate for title validation and blockchain-backed securitised deeds as pivotal yet reveals critical gaps in biometric verification and automated compliance that perpetuate impersonation and document tampering risks.Consequently, the paper proposes institutional recalibration beyond digitisation: (1) integrating Kenya's stakeholder-centric "phygital" hybrid systems during Zimbabwe's 24-month validation phase; (2) embedding real-time identity cross-checks; and (3) implementing immutable audit trails to fulfil Section 90 of the Deeds Registries Act.These recommendations reconfigure the Deeds Registry as a guarantor of constitutional property rights guaranteed in Section 71(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013.The study contributes to debates on counteracting deed fraud in Africa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munashe Matambo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: