This analysis combines big data and systematic reviews to explore urolithiasis epidemiology, suggesting improved data reliability and collection methods.
The combined analysis of Global Burden od Disease (GBD) data and traditional systematic reviews still appears to be the preferable approach for studying the epidemiology of urolithiasis, pending the resolution of the critical issues of GBD studies regarding the reliability and completeness of their sources, possible biases in data collection and data modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alberto Trinchieri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: