Analysis explores courtroom language choice and its influence on legal consciousness in Hong Kong, suggesting important social implications.
This paper examines the impact of courtroom language choice in a complex two-language legal system and the relationship of these languages and choices in the development and evolution of a post-colonial legal consciousness in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR).The primary case, observations, and interview data come from the Coroners Court in the HKSAR Judiciary, as it represents a uniquely non-criminal court with a wide capacity for social relevance.The data support a clearer view than previously obtained of the nature of Cantonese language in a common law court and the everyday efforts to spread a Cantonese version of the common law.Through this re-making of courtroom legal language, we can also see a possible reflection of a localizing legal consciousness in the wider society and judiciary of the HKSAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew S. MacNaughton (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: