Comparative evaluation demonstrates energy recovery and treatment solutions for microbrewery waste streams, implying a sustainable approach.
This study explores a circular bioeconomy strategy for microbrewery waste by characterizing and valorizing its primary waste streams: sugar mash water (A), spent yeast with hops (B), spent yeast without hops (C), and alkaline cleaning wastewater (D). The biochemical methane potential of the acidic organic blend (E, from A-C) was assessed under mesophilic (38 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) conditions, revealing significant substrate-specific temperature sensitivity. The highly acidic blend E (pH 4.16) was effectively neutralized to pH 7.0 using the on-site alkaline wash water (D, pH 12.03). Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the neutralized blend achieved a high methane yield of approximately 500 mL/g VS. Furthermore, the alkaline wash water successfully served as an in situ CO2 scrubber, upgrading biogas to ~100% methane content. This integrated approach demonstrates a viable, closed-loop pathway for microbreweries to achieve simultaneous energy recovery from organic wastes and chemical-free treatment of acidic and alkaline effluents. The findings also highlight the importance of substrate-specific thermal management and provide a robust framework for microbreweries to achieve energy independence and internal CO2 neutralization–wastewater treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: