Shows antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from raptors, indicating environmental health risks.
Wildlife can serve as a potential reservoir and spreader of resistant and pathogenic bacteria. Raptors, occupying the ecological position of apex or mesopredators, integrate exposure across different habitats and therefore serve as bioindicators of environmental dissemination of pathogens. In this study, we isolated 54 Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains from feces sampled from 64 raptors admitted to a wildlife rescue center in Central Italy. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted, followed by molecular screening for resistance genes. Additionally, the presence of intestinal E. coli pathotypes, including STEC, EHEC, EPEC, ETEC, EAEC, EIEC, and NTEC, was evaluated through virulence gene analysis. Results indicated notable resistance to commonly used antimicrobials, with the highest percentages observed for ampicillin (40.74%), fluoroquinolones (31.48%), and tetracycline (25.93%). Molecular analysis of phenotypically resistant isolates identified the presence of several resistance genes, including blaTEM (13 isolates), blaCTX-M (4 isolates), blaCMY-2 (3 isolates), blaSHV (1 isolate), tet(A) (9 isolates), tet(B) (4 isolates), cat1 (1 isolate), and cmlA (2 isolates). Furthermore, 29.63% of isolates were classified as multidrug-resistant (MDR) and 7.41% as extensively drug-resistant (XDR). Regarding virulence profiles, one isolate harboring eaeA, escV, and astA genes was classified as atypical EPEC, while 27.78% isolates had only the astA gene, preventing precise pathotype assignment. These findings highlight the circulation of antimicrobial-resistant and potentially pathogenic E. coli strains within raptor populations in Central Italy, emphasizing the zoonotic potential and reaffirming the role of raptors as bioindicators within a One Health approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cagnoli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: