Retrospective analysis investigates clinical factors affecting survival in relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma, suggesting improved outcomes with strategic treatment.
Relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma has poor prognosis despite aggressive salvage therapies. This study retrospectively examined 37 consecutive relapsed patients treated with high-dose ¹³¹I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (mIBG) to explore clinical and treatment-related factors associated with overall survival (OS). The patients received high-dose 131I-mIBG (≥ 444 MBq/kg) between September 2009 and December 2019. The prognostic factors analysed were as follows: relapse order (second or third vs. first), age, lesion type at 131I-mIBG therapy, Curie score (> 2 vs. ≤2), SIOPEN (> 2 vs. ≤2), presence of pain, prior allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), prior external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), MYCN status and tumour response (complete remission [CR] vs. non-CR). OS was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, with significance determined by log-rank tests and Cox regression. Of the 37 patients, 24 died during follow-up. Among the 36 evaluable patients, the 5-year OS rate from the 131I-mIBG infusion was 41% ± 8%. In the univariable analysis, second or subsequent relapse, a Curie score > 2, a SIOPEN score > 2, pain at infusion, absence of prior EBRT, prior allogeneic HSCT, and failure to achieve CR were associated with poorer OS. The absence of pre-131I-mIBG EBRT and prior allogeneic HSCT remained significantly associated with inferior OS in the multivariable analysis. High-dose 131I-mIBG yielded a 5-year OS of 41% in relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma. Lack of pre-131I-mIBG EBRT and previous allogeneic HSCT were independent indicators of poor prognosis. Early incorporation of 131I-mIBG and strategic patient selection may improve outcomes. Prospective studies with molecular profiling are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakabayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: