Investigation shows melting behavior of droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces, indicating improved anti-icing mechanisms.
The melting behavior of frozen droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces and their anti-icing mechanisms were systematically investigated via high-speed imaging and quantitative analysis. Two superhydrophobic surfaces (coating-based and etched-based) and a flat control surface were compared to track droplet morphological evolution, solid-liquid interface dynamics, and key metrics under freezing temperatures (–12 to –3°C) and warming conditions (3 to 23°C). Results show that droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces melt from the bottom, forming a tilted, rotating ice cap. The height coefficient decreases continuously (remaining <1) and stabilizes around 0.875,with the coating-type substrate showing the slowest decay (15% reduction over 40 s) versus the control surface, which declines to 0.70 in only 16 s. Contact angle evolution is non-monotonic—initially decreasing, then increasing. Melting on superhydrophobic surfaces lasts 1–2 times longer than on untreated ones. At –9°C freezing and 13°C warming, the coating surface melts the droplet in 98.0 s, versus 42.4 s for the control. This delay is attributed to the “cavitation effect” of micro/nanostructures forming a gas film barrier that reduces solid–liquid heat transfer, along with reduced interfacial tension from low-surface-energy modification. For identical surface chemistry, the coating with a roughness of 6.513 μm exhibits a 30% greater melting time than the Fluorosilane-modified (FGW) surface with a roughness of 0.114 μm. FGWs also outperform stearic acid-modified (SA) surfaces in delaying melting. Two distinct melting modes have been identified: convection-dominated melting on non-superhydrophobic surfaces, and on superhydrophobic ones, rotation-driven melting governed by interfacial tension–buoyancy interplay, often accompanied by bubble release.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: