PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Counselor Education and Supervision0 citations

An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Counselor Educators’ Experiences of Using Artificial Intelligence in Their Teaching

View Full Paper
PWPhillip L. WaalkesJFJacqueline M. Swank FastenowUniversity of MissouriDDDaniel A. DeCinoUniversity of South Dakota

Key Points

  • This research examines how counselor educators experience and utilize artificial intelligence in their teaching practices.
  • Conducted individual and focus group interviews
  • Collected supporting documents like syllabi and assignments
  • Analyzed themes from participant data
  • Identified five main themes: concerns and risks, navigating complex emotions, responsibility to students, influence of systems, application of AI in teaching.
  • Participants experienced trial-and-error with AI due to institutional policy gaps, leading to feelings of shame and fear.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the last few years, AI integration has rapidly increased in counseling and counselor education. Given its prevalence, counselor educators have a responsibility to consider AI in their teaching to prepare students to intentionally and critically use AI in their careers. Yet, limited research exists to understand counselor educators’ decisions and meaning making regarding AI in teaching. In this Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis study, we conducted individual interviews and a focus group interview and collected documents (e.g., syllabus statements, assignments) to examine counselor educators’ experiences using AI in their teaching and promote intentional and reflective use of AI. The resulting themes of our data analysis were (a) concerns and risks, (b) navigating complex emotions, (c) responsibility to students and the profession, (d) influence of systems, and (e) application of AI in teaching. Participants shared engaging in a trial‐and‐error process of experimenting with AI in their teaching considering the lack of policies and resources from institutions and counseling organizations which could cause feelings of shame and fear resulting from the lack of open dialogue about AI in counselor education. Implications for counselor educators and institutions include creating continuously updated AI policies and resources and offering spaces where counselor educators can discuss challenges, successes, and feelings and share resources regarding AI in teaching.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Waalkes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5d345a333a821460ada2https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.70026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Navigating the New Frontier: Recommendations to Address the Crisis and Potential of AI in the Classroom2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2Counselor Education in the Era of ChatGPT and Other Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots2025 · 4 citations
  3. 3Problematising Artificial Intelligence in Social Work Education: Challenges, Issues and Possibilities2021 · 69 citations
  4. 4A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research2023 · 1,280 citations
  5. 5AI in higher education: unveiling academicians’ perspectives on teaching, research, and ethics in the age of ChatGPT2024 · 47 citations