Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative survey assesses drinking water pollution risks in eastern Nepal, indicating severe awareness gaps.
Access to clean and safe drinking water remains a major challenge in Nepal in rapidly urbanizing municipalities. This study used a quantitative approach, surveying a sample comprising 69.95% males and 30.05% females aged 25–44 years (67.78%), in Nepal's two easternmost municipalities. Tube wells were the primary drinking water source for 68% of households. Only 25% had tested their water; limited knowledge (58%) was the main barrier, 69% of respondents said that they used filters, distrust and inconvenience hindered wider adoption. Eighty per cent identified perceived pollution sources and 96.63% linked perceived contamination to disease, yet no respondents had participated in awareness programs. Storage practices were inadequate; households relied on earthen pots (43%), bottles (40%), and buckets (16%) with irregular cleaning. Our analysis showed strong linkage between water color, taste, and pollution sources, whereas poor storage and lower-income levels were strong predictors of post-storage discoloration. Seventy-five per cent of households were categorized as very high risk, with diarrhea (35.59%) being the most reported disease, disproportionately affecting children (0–12 years) and the elderly (>60 years) based on the questionnaire. The study shows that there is an urgent need for community-based awareness programs, improved water quality monitoring, and targeted policy interventions aligned with Sustainable Development Goal 6.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhakal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: