Review explores combined multi-omics and multimodal imaging for diagnosing tumors, highlighting potential implications for personalized medicine.
Thoracic and abdominal tumors, such as lung, breast, liver, and colorectal cancers, are characterized by high incidence and mortality rates, posing a significant threat to global health. Traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, primarily based on histopathological assessment and single-modality imaging, often fail to capture tumor heterogeneity fully. In the era of precision medicine, the integration of multi-omics technologies (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) with multimodal imaging (computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)) has emerged as a promising strategy to bridge macroscopic imaging phenotypes and microscopic molecular characteristics. This review systematically explores the synergistic application of multi-omics analysis and multimodal imaging in diagnosing and treating thoracic and abdominal tumors. It highlights advances in imaging technologies (such as radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation) and multi-omics approaches (such as liquid biopsy and single-cell sequencing), alongside their clinical applications in early diagnosis, molecular subtyping, treatment response evaluation, and prognosis prediction across thoracic-abdominal and other specialties such as liver cancer and cardiothoracic surgery. Despite challenges in data standardization, algorithm interpretability, and clinical translation, this integrated framework holds great potential for advancing personalized oncology. Future directions should focus on leveraging next-generation technologies (such as photon-counting CT and spatial transcriptomics), transitioning from correlative analyses to causal mechanistic studies, and translating integrated imaging-omics models into clinical decision support systems to guide personalized therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: