Key result
AI/ML models predict perioperative and long-term bariatric surgery outcomes with an AUC up to 0.93.
Why the study?
Clinical adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning in metabolic and bariatric surgery requires a comprehensive understanding of current applications and limitations across the surgical pathway.
Does the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning improve decision-making, perioperative care, and outcome prediction in patients undergoing bariatric surgery?
Systematic Review (n=27)
Does the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning improve decision-making, perioperative care, and outcome prediction in patients undergoing bariatric surgery?
AI and ML are rapidly transforming bariatric surgery with high predictive accuracy for perioperative outcomes, though clinical integration requires further external validation and ethical safeguards.
May enhance bariatric perioperative decision-making; leaves open clinical adoption pending external validation and prospective trials.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly integrated into metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), offering opportunities to enhance decision-making, optimize perioperative care, and personalize outcomes. However, their clinical adoption requires a comprehensive understanding of current applications and limitations. To systematically review the use of AI and ML across the bariatric surgery pathway, from preoperative planning to postoperative follow-up. A systematic search of PubMed and Embase (last accessed August 28, 2025) identified original studies applying AI/ML in MBS. Inclusion criteria were studies involving bariatric patients and AI/ML-based models for clinical or perioperative purposes. Data on study design, sample size, surgical procedure, AI/ML technique, and primary outcomes were extracted. Studies were categorized into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Of 142 records screened, 27 studies met inclusion criteria. Preoperative applications focused on patient selection, anatomical prediction, and risk stratification, including models predicting weight-loss success, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and hiatal hernia. Intraoperative research explored operative time forecasting, workflow optimization, and automated video analysis for skill assessment and step recognition. Postoperative models addressed complication prediction, nutritional surveillance, and long-term weight trajectory forecasting. Reported accuracy was high (AUC up to 0.93), but external validation and fairness audits were limited. Emerging evidence also supports AI-driven educational tools, including large language models for surgical training. AI is rapidly transforming bariatric surgery across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pathway, offering unprecedented opportunities for personalization, efficiency, and quality improvement. From risk prediction to skill assessment and long-term outcome forecasting, its applications can augment, rather than replace, human expertise. Ethical safeguards, transparency, and equitable access remain critical for safe and effective integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vitiello et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Severe obesity requiring metabolic and bariatric surgery (n=27). Artificial intelligence and machine learning models vs. Traditional clinical methods, scoring systems, or manual assessment was evaluated on Applications and predictive accuracy of AI/ML models across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Artificial intelligence and machine learning models achieved high predictive accuracy (AUC up to 0.93) across 27 studies for optimizing perioperative and long-term outcomes in bariatric surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: