This comparative study evaluates solar irradiance prediction accuracy in Jordan using ANN and SVR models, indicating SVR's superiority.
The paper builds a day-ahead solar-irradiance forecast of a given site in Jordan (32.5566° N, 35.8442° E) using the publicly reproducible NASA POWER day-to-day surface meteorology and solar-flux data. The work was implemented by learning calendar/seasonal encodings, physically inspired interactions, rolling statistics, and irradiance lags, and compares three learners that are trained using the same, time-ordered protocol feed-forward back-propagation (FFBP), a convolutional feed-forward network (CFBP; Conv1D + Dense), and ε-SVR with an RBF kernel. SVR has the highest precision on the held-out test block, with RMSE = 0.3799 kWh m–2 day–1, MAE = 0.2499, MAPE = 7.02%, nRMSE = 0.071, and R2 = 0.9651; FFBP and CFBP have greater errors and smaller values of R 2. These findings can be explained by diagnostic plots: SVR tracks time series peaks and troughs most closely and has the smallest parity scatter and error distribution whereas CFBP configuration suppresses high-frequency variability. A manual historical check using one month of context to predict 2014-02-01 reproduces the same ranking and shows SVR’s near-zero bias, indicating robust transfer to an unseen period. Overall, under the same engineered features and split, SVR provides the most reliable day-ahead irradiance signal for this site, with ANNs offering acceptable but less precise alternatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shatnawi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: