In vitro study demonstrates no significant impact of 25% hydrogen peroxide on flexural strength of resin composites, suggesting material type is more crucial.
Resin-based composites (RBCs) are commonly used in restorative dentistry, but bleaching agents may compromise their mechanical integrity. The effect of in-office bleaching with 25% hydrogen peroxide (HP) on the flexural strength (FS) of contemporary RBCs remains unclear. An in vitro study was conducted using three resin composites: Beautifil II (giomer), Spectrum (microhybrid), and Omnichroma (universal). Seventy-two bar-shaped specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were allocated into six groups (n = 12 each). Three groups served as unbleached controls representing giomer, microhybrid, and single-shade universal resin composites stored in distilled water. The other three groups were the corresponding bleaching subgroups, treated with 25% hydrogen peroxide gel activated in three 15-minute light-assisted cycles (total 45 min). Bleaching was performed with 25% HP gel (Philips Zoom) applied in three 15-min cycles with light activation. The FS was measured by three-point bending according to ISO 4049. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc tests (p < 0.05). Bleaching with 25% HP had no significant effect on FS across materials (p = 0.618). The resin composite type significantly influenced the FS (p < 0.001). Spectrum exhibited higher FS values than Beautifil II and Omnichroma, which were statistically similar. In-office bleaching with 25% HP did not reduce the FS of the tested RBCs. The material composition had a greater impact on FS than bleaching, with the microhybrid resin composite (Spectrum) performing better than the giomer and universal resin composites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grover et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: