PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Asian Journal of Medical Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Two vaccines, one pandemic: Retrospective insights into Covishield and Covaxin effectiveness

ITIndranil ThakurDiamond Harbour Women's UniversityPCPiyali ChowdhuryUniversity of East AngliaAGA. K. GhoshDiamond Harbour Women's University

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the clinical presentation, disease severity, and in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients vaccinated with Covishield and Covaxin.
  • Retrospective data collection from Electronic Medical Records and Bed Head Tickets
  • Comparison of clinical profiles between Covishield and Covaxin patients
  • Assessment of disease severity and in-hospital outcomes such as survival or mortality
  • 72% of the Covishield group had additional risk factors and comorbidities compared to 42.6% in the Covaxin group
  • Median hospital stay was less than 7 days for both groups
  • 93% of Covaxin patients had normal sensorium versus 82.6% for Covishield
  • Statistically significant differences were found in CURB-65 and quick sequential organ failure assessment scores between groups

Abstract

Background: Considering the emergence of new variants, it becomes essential to know the dynamics of the antibody profile for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease and its protective efficacy provided by the vaccines. Aims and Objectives: Comparing the Covishield and Covaxin jabbed COVID-19 patients in terms of clinical presentation, disease severity, and in-hospital outcome. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from the Electronic Medical Record and Bed Head Ticket during March 2021 to February 2022 and compared considering clinical profile, disease severity, and in-hospital outcome, such as survival or mortality for each arm. Results: The majority (72%) of Covishield (CV) group had added risk factors and comorbidities in comparison to 42.6% in Covaxin (CS) group. The median length of hospital stay is <7days in both arms. The Median age in years in CS arm and CV arm was 54.23 and 60, respectively. Vaccine doses and comorbidities had no statistically significant association with supplemental oxygen requirement at presentation. 93% patients had normal sensorium in the CS arm, in contrast to 82.6% in the CV arm. The number of doses and presence of comorbidities had a statistically significant association with altered sensorium. The difference between the two arms for both the CURB-65 and quick sequential organ failure assessment scores was statistically significant. Conclusion: Both vaccines show almost similar efficacy in terms of clinical presentation and in-hospital outcome. The CV group had statistically significant added risk factors and comorbidities compared to the CS arm. Furthermore, the CS arm showed less severity in terms of sensorium compared to the CV arm. The number of vaccine doses and comorbidities had a statistically significant association with altered sensorium.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thakur et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e115a333a821460c2d3https://doi.org/10.71152/ajms.v17i4.5164
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper