Field experiment evaluates potassium application timing and sources, indicating improved crop nutrition and sustainability.
Silicate rocks represent alternative K sources when finely ground, reducing production costs and dependence on imported fertilizers. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of potassium (K) dose, application timing, and fertilizer sources on the concentrations and accumulation of K, silicon (Si), and sodium (Na) in maize diagnostic leaves, straw, and grains under a no-tillage system in Savanna. The soil was classified as Typic Haplustox (Oxisol). The experiment followed a randomized block design in a 2 × 4 × 3 factorial scheme, with two application times (30 days before sowing soybean and at sowing soybean), four K2O rates (0, 40, 80, and 120 kg ha−1), and three sources (KCl, Potasil, and Ekosil). K fertilization was applied by broadcasting without incorporation, before the preceding crop. Potasil provided a higher foliar Si concentration, and Si accumulation in grain and straw increased with the increment of K fertilization using the Potasil. Early fertilization promoted greater K accumulation in maize straw. For grain K accumulation, moderate K2O doses favor greater accumulation, with Ekosil and Potasil showing superior results compared to KCl. There was less sodium accumulation in the grains with Ekosil compared to KCl. Agronomic efficiency is maximized at 40 kg ha−1 of K2O, with Ekosil showing the best performance for maize crop. These findings indicate that alternative K sources, applied at optimized rates, improve crop nutrition and promote sustainability in soybean–maize crop rotation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: