PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026Blood Advances2 citationsOpen Access

AVD is an effective chemotherapy backbone in first-line treatment of older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

View Full Paper
NÖNinja ÖvergaardKLKjersti LiaJCJeremia Collin

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
  • Data collected from 1569 patients diagnosed in Sweden, Denmark, and Norway from 2000 to 2021.
  • Patients received various chemotherapy regimens, including AVD and ABVD.
  • Multivariable analyses conducted on overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes.
  • AVD showed improved overall survival compared to ABVD.
  • Progression-free survival was also significantly better with AVD relative to ABVD.
  • Patients on CHOP had comparable outcomes to ABVD, while other regimens tended to perform poorer.

Abstract

No universal gold standard chemotherapy exists for the treatment of older (≥60 years) patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). To evaluate the current curative treatment strategies used in the Nordic countries, we collected data from patients diagnosed in Sweden, Denmark and Norway during the years 2000 to 2021. We included 1569 patients: 704 (45%) Swedish, 671 (43%) Danish and 194 (12%) Norwegian. Of these, 671 (43%) received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), 123 (8%) received doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (AVD), 465 (31%) received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) and 212 (13%) received other chemotherapy (single agent or combination). Eighty-two patients (5%) lacked information on first line regimen. In multivariable analyses of overall survival (OS), treatment with AVD was associated with improved survival compared to ABVD, whereas there was a trend toward inferior survival among patients receiving CHOP or other regimens. For progression-free survival (PFS), multivariable analysis likewise demonstrated significantly improved outcome with AVD relative to ABVD, while outcomes for the CHOP group were comparable to ABVD. Outcome for patients receiving other regimens tended to be poorer. Collectively, outcome for AVD with respect to both OS and PFS was at least equal to ABVD and often superior to CHOP. By omitting bleomycin, treatment-related toxicity is known to be reduced in AVD compared to ABVD. Based on our findings, AVD is a preferable chemotherapy option in older cHL patients and should rightly be considered as backbone in treatment with novel drugs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Övergaard et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5e865a333a821460cec9https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025018954
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ABVD in Older Patients With Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated Within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10 and HD11 Trials2013 · 112 citations
  2. 2Seven-year overall survival analysis from ECHELON-1 study of A+AVD versus ABVD in patients with previously untreated stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma.2024 · 12 citations
  3. 3Frontline ABVD Remains an Effective Option in Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Real-World Data from Turkey2026
  4. 4Brentuximab Vedotin With Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine for Patients Aged 18–59 Years With Untreated Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Largest Real‐Life Series From Southern Italy Cancer Centers2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Treatment of older patients with Hodgkin lymphoma2025 · 3 citations